WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] approach for heavily hw-oriented values in smbios for gu

To: <aball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] approach for heavily hw-oriented values in smbios for guests
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:57:50 +0000
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:58:09 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1163692476.24087.28.camel@localhost>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccJl/d5Ne5aRnWLEduU6wAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] approach for heavily hw-oriented values in smbios for guests
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
On 16/11/06 15:54, "Andrew D. Ball" <aball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When I was implementing smbios, I occasionally put in mock values for
> things like the data width of dimms, much to my chagrin.
> 
> What do y'all think the best approach to such situations would be?  If
> specific migration groups were enforced, such that a guest will not be
> migrated to a different type of cpu/memory/etc., putting accuracte data
> there makes sense to me.  Otherwise, I'd prefer to put no values.
> However, even though the SMBIOS 2.4 standard specifies lots of places
> where a value of 'unknown' is syntactically valid, the comformance
> guidelines require a ton of very hardware oriented things to be fully
> specified.

I'm pretty sure that consistent lying is the best approach for most such
fields.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel