WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer

To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer
From: Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:31:10 +0900
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:32:44 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:21:42 +0100") <87velfhkdl.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87odrfptrb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611160109.kAG19CiO003967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87velfhkdl.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, Markus

your code location of xenfb.h is in 
linux-2.6.16.29-xen/include/xen/interface/io/xenfb.h
it is wrong position.

It should be located in 
xen/include/public/io

please see mkbuildtree@linux-sparce
and 
see your linux-2.6.16.29-xen/include/xen/interface/io
with "ls -l" 
these file is linked from
xen/include/public/io

Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI



>Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hello, Markus
>>
>>  I want to test PV patch but current patch does not work.
>> (as Steven Smith suggested, for example xenfb.h xenkbd.h location is not 
>> correct)
>> Could you give me a working version patch?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Atsushi SAKAI
>
>My frontend patch is relative to the Linux tree, not the Xen tree, and
>not the *sparse* Linux tree within the Xen tree.
>
>The guardians of the source tree assure me they greatly benefit from
>having a sparse tree there.  Good for them[*]!  I don't.  It's a pain
>in the neck for me.  By refusing to touch the sparse tree, I shift a
>good part of my pain to those who enjoy the benefits.  I consider that
>fair.
>
>To try my patch, let Xen create an ordinary source tree, then patch
>that.  I do test that it applies there before submitting.
>
>If you'd rather sparsify it, perhaps a knowledgeable user of the
>sparse tree can help you.
>
>[*] No irony intended, honest, officer.
>







_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel