WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Does Xen in 64 bit mode support shadow page table mode?

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Does Xen in 64 bit mode support shadow page table mode?
From: Randy Thelen <rthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:46:52 -0800
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:47:08 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C17F2CB6.4486%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C17F2CB6.4486%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 13/11/06 9:12 pm, "Randy Thelen" <rthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm trying to experiment with running a 64 bit paravirtualized guest
in shadow page table mode, and I'm getting an error while pinning the
page table.

The call to pin the pages is in xc_linux_build.c:

On Nov 14, 2006, at 12:20 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:

If building an auto-translated guest, Xen expects the pin request to specify
a guest pseudo-physical address.

The bug went away when you removed the auto-translation feature from the
guest kernel header because that will have overridden your request for
auto-translate mode (most likely) and you're not running on shadow
pagetables at all.

Do you think this problem is caused by the bad dsi.v_start that I've got for my kernel image?

That doesn't make a lot of sense to me because the pfn() shouldn't care about the virtual addresses of my kernel.

-- Randy

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel