| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [PV-ON-HVM] Don't generat
> This does solve the problem, however it adds unnecessary overhead
> (one more trap into xen at the end of each event handler). IMO, the real
> cause should be in pic_intack, where pending irr is converted into isr.
I'm inclined to agree here. The patch I checked in certainly wasn't
very pretty, and this is the best alternative I've heard so far.
However, it looks like it's actually slower than what we've got at the
moment: NPtcp between dom0 and domU on my test box reports a latency
and maximum bandwidth of 36.42us and 1961.58Mbps without this patch, or
45.94us and 1874.69Mbps with. All measurements are best-of-three.
Looking at the patch, it ought to have been slightly faster, so these
results rather surprised me. Did you do any benchmarks yourself?
Steven.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home