|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy.
Hi, Emmanuel
Sorry for mis-reading it.
The measured value to omit 2 SPIN DomU is same as w/ 2SPIN DomU.
Result
44
133
533
(Kbps)
And xentop says
the CPU usage for Dom0 DomU3 is same as w/ 2 SPIN DomU
(Both Dom0 and DomU3 usages are 1.0 to 1.2 % )
Thanks,
Atsushi SAKAI
>The bench mark is same as previous one.
>
>Only Dom0 and DomU3 are no spinning vcpus.
>Other DomU1 and DomU2 are spinning vcpus.
>
>#pcpu(s)=1
>#vcpu(s)=2(no spinning)
>#vcpu(s)=2(spinning)
>#vcpu(s)=4(total spinning and no spinning)
>
>>
>>Out of curiosity, what are the numbers like when running this
>>benchmark with no spinning VCPUs competing?
>>
>>> With this patches, the CREDIT scheduler changed for I/O aware.
>>> (At vcpu_wake, the priority changes from UNDER to BOOST,
>>> At vcpu_acct, the priority changes from BOOST to UNDER.)
>>>
>>> It seems reasonable fixes!
>>> But I am afraid many I/O intensive GuestOSes are running.
>>> (I hope this prospect is needless fear.)
>>
>>I've been careful to prevent BOOSTed VCPUs from taking over the
>>system or otherwise impacting fairness:
>>
>>- Only VCPUs with positive credits can be boosted.
>>- While boosted, a VCPU is charged for any substential CPU
>> resources consumed.
>>- VCPUs can run uninterrupted with a boosted priority for no
>> more than 10ms (1/3-rd of a full time slice).
>>
>>Only VCPUs which consume a negligeable amount of CPU resources
>>should get real benefit from boosting. When multiple VCPUs are
>>boosted, they will round robin or be queued FIFO. The idea is
>>for a boosted VCPU to preempt spinners but not other boosted
>>I/O intensive guests. A VCPU cannot use the boosting mechanism
>>to consume more CPU than its allocated fair share.
>
>I agree.
>
>Thanks
>Atsushi SAKAI
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Atsushi SAKAI
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Atsushi SAKAI
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Atsushi SAKAI
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Atsushi SAKAI
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy.,
Atsushi SAKAI <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Emmanuel Ackaouy
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy., Pasi Kärkkäinen
|
|
|
|
|