[Xen-devel] RE: double invoke of hvm_do_resume

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] RE: double invoke of hvm_do_resume
From:	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:03:50 +0800
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:04:51 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acb3dINmZViORMs5TnmxVg2vPD3zjwADdP1pAA995FA=
Thread-topic:	double invoke of hvm_do_resume

Yes, thanks!
Eddie

________________________________

From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 2006年10月24日 23:38
To: Dong, Eddie
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: double invoke of hvm_do_resume





On 24/10/06 14:58, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



        Keir: 
                Not sure from when, at least now hvm_do_resume is double 
invoked in both 1: arch_vmx_do_resume from schedule_tail, and 2) 
vmx_asm_do_vmentry of ASM code for both x86 32 & 64 bits. I am wondering if the 
#1 is a redundant, can u have a double check?
        
        thx,eddie 
        
        

#2 was redundant. It’s gone from xen-unstable already.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: double invoke of hvm_do_resume