WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Reporting wrong status for non-existant files

To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Reporting wrong status for non-existant files
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:15:46 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:16:08 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061023194516.GD14072@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061023194516.GD14072@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 04:45:16PM -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The block scripts under tools/examples is not reporting the proper
> information in the event of a non-exitent file being passed on, like in
> "file:/nonexistant,hda,w".
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Glauber de Oliveira Costa
> Red Hat Inc.
> "Free as in Freedom"

> # HG changeset patch
> # User root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> # Date 1161631865 14400
> # Node ID 6b28d144c5814b5206592e93bcea4b7d0a752e8a
> # Parent  29b02d929b7e4df6016c16ebba71d6d73462882e
> The block script is reporting the file as non-writable, even if it does
> not exists
> 

I'd love to take this patch, but I can't without a Signed-off-by: line from
you.  This is true of all the patches you've recently sent.  Could you send
this one again, but with a Signed-off-by line in place, please?

Thanks,

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>