[Xen-devel] Re: double invoke of hvm_do_resume

To:	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: double invoke of hvm_do_resume
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:37:41 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:39:10 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<0E6FE5D295DE5B4B8D9070C26A227987056975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acb3dINmZViORMs5TnmxVg2vPD3zjwADdP1p
Thread-topic:	double invoke of hvm_do_resume
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 24/10/06 14:58, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Keir:
Not sure from when, at least now hvm_do_resume is double invoked in both 1: arch_vmx_do_resume from schedule_tail, and 2) vmx_asm_do_vmentry of ASM code for both x86 32 & 64 bits. I am wondering if the #1 is a redundant, can u have a double check?

thx,eddie

#2 was redundant. It’s gone from xen-unstable already.

-- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: double invoke of hvm_do_resume