[Xen-devel] Re: Address check restriction

To:	Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: Address check restriction
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:47:21 +0100
Delivery-date:	Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:58:45 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1161286657.11120.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acbzv8XUBIHTGl+zEduNyQANk04WTA==
Thread-topic:	Address check restriction
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 19/10/06 8:37 pm, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>     if ( !hvm_apic_support(d) &&
>          (((gpa >= 0xFEC00000) && (gpa < FED40000)) ||
>            (gpa >= 0xFED45000)  ))

The test should be removed entirely and handle_mmio() should be extended to
deal appropriately with accesses to unused addresses, if it doesn't already.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Address check restriction, Stefan Berger [Xen-devel] Re: Address check restriction, Keir Fraser <= [Xen-devel] Re: Address check restriction, Stefan Berger

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Address check restriction