Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix a failure in PCI Compliance Test

To:	"Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>, <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix a failure in PCI Compliance Test
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:11:10 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:11:48 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<666CC8FCE3247C4DA876BA979059781A5C26E4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcbxDs4fXr5iECFiTvOWvTyaYNnh8QByZn6z
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix a failure in PCI Compliance Test
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 16/10/06 11:43, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The Xen platform device (introduced in changeset 11161) would cause
> HCT's PCI Compliance Test to generate a failure message. The patch fixes
> this.

Why do we *have* to have a subsystem vendor id?

For example, I don't see the PIIX PCI-ISA bridge specifying one, and so I
guess it defaults to zero in that case? But doesn't fail HCT?

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Fix a failure in PCI Compliance Test