[Xen-devel] Re: [patch rfc 1/3] xen arch header rework.

>>> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> 10/11/06 11:16 AM >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> +    uint32_t      unused;  /* alignment                                    
>>>  */
>> 
>> Could you use _pad[0-9]* here as is done elsewhere, so that scripts
>
>Fixed using "_attribute__((aligned (8)))" instead.

If I remember right, we had complaints about such an approach already -
public headers shouldn't contain (unconditional) GNU-isms.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Re: [patch rfc 1/3] xen arch header rework., Jan Beulich <= [Xen-devel] Re: [patch rfc 1/3] xen arch header rework., Gerd Hoffmann

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] fix PCI interrupt routing via ACPI, Keir Fraser

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH,RFC 0/17] 32-on-64 work progress, Jan Beulich

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Protect xenoprof.c global state, Markus Armbruster

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: [patch rfc 1/3] xen arch header rework., Gerd Hoffmann

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]