Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:

> Yes, I think that the best thing to do would be as Jimi suggests, and for us
> to pick one known-good snapshot, and host it ourselves.  That way, the source
> for the XenSource ramdisks will always be available and we don't have to rely
> upon the upstream buildroot archive.
> 
> The next time I build a ramdisk I'll put the buildroot tar on
> xm-test.xensource.com, and change the Makefile to refer to that instead.

What about adding seomthing like:

BT_FILE=buildroot-snapshot
ifdef UCLIB
      BT_SITE="... uclib ..."
else
      BT_SITE="... xensource ..."
endif
BT_URL="$(BT_SITE)/(BT_FILE)"

then have a buildroot-snapshot in xensource somewhere, this allows easy
testing or the upstream snapshots make vs make UCLIB=1, and brace users
automagically end up with a working buildroot if they trying to build
there own ramdisks.

Yours Tony

   linux.conf.au       http://linux.conf.au/ || http://lca2007.linux.org.au/
   Jan 15-20 2007      The Australian Linux Technical Conference!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update xm-test to support new architectures, Tony Breeds

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Have the blktap allocate devices dynamically., Steven Rostedt

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures, Ewan Mellor

Next by Thread:

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures, Hollis Blanchard

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to suppo