| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paravirt framebuffer backend tools [2/5]
> >First: I now agree with you that scancodes are a better choice than
> >keysyms, and that I was wrong initially.
> The problem with scancodes is that you cannot always get scancodes from
> the viewer. You can get scancodes from SDL but you can only get keysyms
> from VNC. We would have to map VNC keysyms (which are just Xk keysyms)
> to scancodes?
Ian just pointed out that there's some code in rdesktop to do just
that. xkeymap.c contains stuff to pull the keymap out of the X
server, parse it up, and then do keysym->scancode translation. Of
course, choosing a suitable keymap isn't entirely trivial, since the
server can't see what keymap the client's using.
Steven.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home