WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [UNTESTED] Fix sentinel in call to execlp in tools/i

To: David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [UNTESTED] Fix sentinel in call to execlp in tools/iommu/vnc.c
From: Harry Butterworth <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:31:27 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:31:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <44F5B588.4090505@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <44F5B588.4090505@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:58 -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> August 30, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
> 
> changeset:   11288:a47951e59cbf

> ISSUES:
> 
> x86_64 **BLOCKED (SLES 10 on IBM HS20 Blade 8843)
> 
> Unable to start xen on this machine. Build log shows:
> 
> /usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/ioemu/vnc.c:1272: 
> warning: missing sentinel in function call
> make[3]: *** [vnc.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [subdir-i386-dm] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [ioemu] Error 2
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ...
> make[3]: *** [vnc.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [subdir-i386-dm] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [ioemuinstall] Error 2
> make: *** [install] Error 2"

This patch should fix your problem here.  I have not tested it.  Please
give it a go and report whether it is OK to be committed to the tree.

The issue is that 0 on a 64 bit machine is a 32 bit integer whereas the
sentinel needs to be a 64 bit null pointer for the code to be correct.

Signed-off-by: Harry Butterworth <butterwo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: sentinel.patch
Description: Text Data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>