WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Optimizing x86-64 xenlinux using global pagesfor

To: "Andrew Theurer" <habanero@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Optimizing x86-64 xenlinux using global pagesfor user mode (take 2)
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:18:58 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:19:30 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbMQYTj9mdXI97MRbi+4E2uKOxp3gAA0T4w
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Optimizing x86-64 xenlinux using global pagesfor user mode (take 2)
Andrew Theurer wrote:
> Ian Pratt wrote:
>>> The previous patch had a problem with the builder, which constructs
>>> the initial page tables with the USER bit on. And Xen couldn't
>>> distinguish kernel or use pages. It was partially checked avoiding
>>> the bug, and it's finished with this patch.
>> 
>> Thanks. Have you any updated benchmark numbers as the bug could have
>> been giving quite a performance boost before.

Looks like part of the boost was realized by the bug, but I still see
consistent and visible improvements with lmbench. If I turn on the
global bits for the kernel pages as well, I see more improvements, which
are comparable with or better than before. I think we need to do macro
benchmarks to see how this helps. 

> 
> FWIW, I had been running more extensive testing on changeset 11225
> (before global-bit) and 11229 (global-bit with revert/fix for dom0
> builder), and they do not match the initial testing I did with rev
> 11118 + global_1 patch.  In fact, I am not seeing really any
> improvement.  I am not sure what is wrong.  Should I just test
> xen-unstable-tip+newest_patch and see where we stand?
> 

Yes, please. You shouldn't have observed any performance difference
between 11225 and 11229 because the changeset 11226 did not enable the
global bit. 

> -Andrew Theurer

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>