xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable c

from [Ed Smith]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable c/s 11269
From:	Ed Smith <esmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:10:11 -0400
Cc:	Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:10:40 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<E1GI9WM-00035M-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<E1GI9WM-00035M-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420)

Hi Steven,

>> Changeset 11269
>> - 64bit SMP & UP guests now boot as do 32bit (non-pae) UP guests.
>> - 32bit SMP (pae) guests do not boot
>>   (failure.6: XEN panic sh2_page_fault__shadow_3_guest_3+0x493/0xdd0)
>>   (failure.7: sh2 error: sh2_remove_shadows(): can't find all
>>    shadows of mfn 10ef3 (shadow2_flags=00000100) domain_crash called
>>    from shadow2-common.c:2251)
>
> Are you sure this is cset 11269? This cset is post 11260 which renamed
> all of the "sh2" stuff to remove the '2'...

The changeset tested is correct 11269 but I didn't bother updated the failure 
text
as this bug has been happening since the new shadow code went in.

> This bug is believed fixed by 11270....

Thats great!  We update our tree and do a build every night so I'll pickup this
c/s tonight and it will get tested.  I'll report tomorrow how this configuration
does in my nightly run.

Thanks,
Ed

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable c/s 11269, Ed Smith Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable c/s 11269, Steven Hand Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable c/s 11269, Ed Smith <=

Previous by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, Ian Pratt
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] pciback error - what does it mean?, Ian Pratt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable c/s 11269, Steven Hand
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [patch] Improve error reporting in XenD, Daniel P. Berrange
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]