WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 1] x86_64: Put .note.* sections into a PT_NO

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 1] x86_64: Put .note.* sections into a PT_NOTE segment in vmlinux II
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:26:48 +0100
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:27:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200608221659.18896.ak@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1156256777.5091.93.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200608221659.18896.ak@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 16:59 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 August 2006 16:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > This patch updates x86_64 linker script to pack any .note.* sections
> > into a PT_NOTE segment in the output file.

> Sorry I tried to apply it, but at least 2.6.18rc4 mainline (which my tree
> is based on) doesn't have a NOTES macro so it doesn't link
> 
> I dropped the NOTES addition for now, presumably it will need to be readded
> later.

Sorry, I should have been clearer about the dependency on the i386 patch
which is currently in -mm. 

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel