|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] is_initial_xendomain()
On 18/8/06 8:56 am, "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
>> #define is_initial_xendomain() (xen_start_info->flags &
> SIF_INITDOMAIN)
>> #else
>> #define is_initial_xendomain() 0
>> #endif
>>
>> If that is acceptable, I'm ready to create a respective patch
>> (but I'd like to avoid spending time on it if there are objections).
>
> Personally, I'd like to see CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST disappear
> altogether. The code size saving is small, and most people use the -xen
> kernel rather than -xen0/-xenU anyway.
A partial cull based on initial_xendomain() would be a good first step.
We'll certainly take the patch if you make one, Jan.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|