|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better tha
>Also, the union in start_info would be clearer as (assuming this
doesn't
>change the offset/size of any fields, which I don't think it does):
> union {
> struct {
> console_mfn/evtchn
> } normal;
> struct {
> con_info_ofs/size
> } init;
> } domain;
>
>Apart from being clearer, the Sun compiler doesn't like anonymous
unions so
>we try to avoid them.
I know you suggested doing it that way, but since the amount of
follow-up changes (to account for the changed naming) would be
higher, I didn't want to do this ...
>By the way: please just send further patches against your previous
>mega-patch. :-)
... in the already too large patch. So it should probably be a
follow-up
adjustment...
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] support console resolutions better than 80x25, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|