| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary
|
To: |
David Lang <dlang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary |
|
From: |
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:26:43 -0700 |
|
Cc: |
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, zach@xxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jlo@xxxxxxxxxx, greg@xxxxxxxxx, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Antonio Vargas <windenntw@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:18:53 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<Pine.LNX.4.63.0608041150360.18862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<44D1CC7D.4010600@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060803190605.GB14237@xxxxxxxxx> <44D24DD8.1080006@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060803200136.GB28537@xxxxxxxxx> <44D2B678.6060400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060803211850.3a01d0cc.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1154667875.11382.37.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060803225357.e9ab5de1.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1154675100.11382.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608040944480.18902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <69304d110608041146t44077033j9a10ae6aee19a16d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608041150360.18862@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) |
David Lang wrote:
I'm not commenting on any of the specifics of the interface calls (I
trust you guys to make that be sane :-) I'm just responding the the idea
that the interface actually needs to be locked down to an ABI as opposed
to just source-level compatability.
you are right that the interface to the HV should be stable. But those are going
to be specific to the HV, the paravirt_ops allows the kernel to smoothly deal
with having different HV's.
So in a way it's an API interface to allow the kernel to deal with multiple
different ABIs that exist today and will in the future.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Message not available
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Rusty Russell
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, David Lang
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Antonio Vargas
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, David Lang
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary,
Arjan van de Ven <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, David Lang
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, David Lang
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Bill Rugolsky Jr.
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Arjan van de Ven
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, David Lang
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Jeff Dike
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, David Lang
- [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary, Jeff Dike
|
|
|
| |
|
Home