| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] HVM SMBIOS support 1/6
On 11 Jul 2006, at 19:12, Andrew D. Ball wrote:
Do you see any other things to work on for the SMBIOS patches? Making
SMBIOS not optional cuts down on a bit of the code, so I'm working on
that and getting the code to run on the latest changeset today.
I think they're basically okay. I find it a bit weird that hvmloader
puts SMBIOS tables in a fixed place and then rombios copies them -- not
sure why that's needed but I suppose you're only copying what is done
for ACPI tables. Couldn't hvmloader write all BIOS tables to a safe
location and be done with them, or is the problem that 0xf0000 upwards
is not available at the time hvmloader runs? Also, is the e820
reservation entry actually valid: 0x9f000-0xA0000 is reserved, but
rombios copies the tables out of that area, right? Does rombios also
update the e820 table?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home