|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Re: VT is comically slow
Andrew Warfield wrote:
> > The QEMU code that we use doesn't go through the dom0 buffer cache, we
> > modified the
> > code to use O_DIRECT. Can't user buffer cache and accelerated drivers
> > (they go right
> > to the disk) together, it can cause disk corruption. The performance
> > numbers we get
> > from this version of QEMU is still 4 to 6 times slower that native disk I/O.
>
> I doubt O_DIRECT buys you much in the way of performance -- as you say
> it's just a correctness thing. Still, the qemu block code is all
> completely synchronous -- the fact that you simply can't have more
> than a single outstanding block request at a time is going to
> seriously harm performance. As Anthony explained, some form of
> asynchronous IO in the qemu drivers would clearly improve performance.
>
That was exactly my point, that O_DIRECT doesn't improve performance. Anthony
had a
a point in his e-mail that buffered I/O could be one of the reasons that
performance
of QEMU is slow.
>
> > You might be right, however even with pipelining and async I/O, I don't
> > think it is going to >> > > get close to native I/O numbers. I guess we'll
> > just have to wait and see.
>
> I'd expect that disk can be made to perform reasonably well with qemu,
> using dma emulation and async IO. The old vmware workstation paper on
> device virtualization does a pretty good job of demonstrating that
> trap and emulate device access sucks, and would seem to imply that
> it's pretty unlikely to be practical for high-rate networking.
>
I understand what you guys are proposing, and I look forward to see your
implementation and to
your performance numbers. In particular it would be very interesting to see
what kind of CPU overhead you'll get. With regard to networking I agree with
the VMWare guys, it is not practical to do traps & emulation to achieve high
rate networking throughput. For example, with our accel drivers on certain
network benchmarks we can drive network almost at wire speeds from an HVM
domain and consume very few CPU cycles in doing this.
Cheers,
-Alex V.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: Re: VT is comically slow,
alex <=
|
|
|
|
|