WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] A credit scheduler issue

To: "Emmanuel Ackaouy" <ack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] A credit scheduler issue
From: "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:13:51 -0700
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:14:24 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acab4nJ8VPTSt2BSRPq+E72jv1xzYw==
Thread-topic: A credit scheduler issue

Hi Emmanuel,

    I am trying to debug the credit scheduler to solve the many HVM domain instability issues we have found with the credit scheduler.

 

    While debugging I notice an odd behavior; When running on a 2 CPU system, dom0 gets 2 vcpus by default. And even if there are no other domains running in the system,  the dom0 vcpus are getting migrated to different pcpus in the load balance. I think it is due to the preemption happening in the credit scheduler; and it is not necessary and is actually wasteful to move vcpus when no of vcpus in the system are equal to no of pcpus.

    I would like to know your thinking about this behavior. Is it an intended in the design?

 

I added this small fix to the scheduler to fix this behavior. And with it I see the stability of Xen improved. Win2003 boot was crashing with unhandled MMIO error on xen64 earlier with credit scheduler. I am not seeing that crash with this small fix anymore. It is quiet possible that there are more bugs I need to catch for HVM domains in the credit scheduler. And I would like to know your thoughts for this change.

 

csched_runq_steal(struct csched_pcpu *spc, int cpu, int pri)

{

    struct list_head *iter;

    struct csched_vcpu *speer;

    struct vcpu *vc;

 

    /* If there are only 1 vcpu in the queue then stealing it from the queue

     * is not going not help in load balancing.

     */

    if (spc->runq.next->next == &spc->runq)

            return NULL;

 

Thanks & Regards,

Nitin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corp

 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>