|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Blktap: Userspace file-based image support.	(RFC
 
Julian Chesterfield wrote:
 
On 19/6/06 8:15 pm, "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
Couple general comments on the code:
Please don't introduce more (ab)uses of /proc.  Sure it's just for
debugging but there's no reason to not make that sysfs.
I'm not an expert here, but the nopage handlers that I've seen return
NOPAGE_SIGBUS instead of manually causing a SIGBUS on current.
I think it's better to use C99 initialization than GCC:
  owner:  ...,  =>  .owner = ...,
Some of the indenting is a bit off from Linux CodingStyle.  Stuff like
if( => if ( and some random spaces after an (.
There's some code commented out with C++ comments too.
What's the significance of /**BLKTAP**/ and /**TAPEND**/?
I'm a little surprised to see these conversion tools too.  Wouldn't it
be easier to just add some parameters to qemu-img?
 
 
 
 Thanks for the comments anthony. When we initially played with qcow 
images it was easier to knock-up our own frontend to the plugins for 
converting between the different image types and testing features like 
image sparseness.  We added an optimisation feature in the xen qcow 
plugin which would allocate full extents for non backing file based 
images as well as the asynchronous callback architecture to enable 
request batching for AIO.
 We could certainly adapt qemu-img to use these and other features. Not 
sure what the best approach for keeping the toolsets in synch between 
the 2 projects would be though.
 
 It may be worth just bringing up the changes on qemu-devel.  I know why 
you'd want to change the cluster size (it's a pain to work with clusters 
< block size).  I saw another comment about making metadata more 
coarse.  Can you clarify the reasons for that?
 I can't imagine there would be that push back in changing the default 
cluster size in qemu-img from 512 to 4096..  Most OS's are going to 
write in that granularity anyway I imagine :-)
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
 
Thanks,
Julian Chesterfield
 
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |