 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] time went backwards
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] time went backwards |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:35:17 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:43:13 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I continue to see occasional 'time went backwards' messages on 3.0-testing on larger systems. Is anyone else seeing such? Have there been any improvements to -unstable that haven't been moved over? If so, can anyone point out the respective changesets? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] Why is 'emulate' as good as writable PT's?, Ian Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] time went backwards, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] CfP Workshop on XEN in HPC Cluster and Grid Computing Environments (XHPC), Marcus Hardt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] time went backwards, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
