WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/

Home

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance...

from [M S, Rajanish]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance...
From:	"M S, Rajanish" <MS.Rajanish@xxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:03:54 -0400
Delivery-date:	Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:04:22 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcaKVFuFs3a6jo8OQCOvU5LBkGo0ZQ==
Thread-topic:	VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance...

Hi,

Is there any IO performance results for Xen3.0.2 stable + VT enabled full virtualization? Our tests shows 100,000 IOPs on Native linux(2.6.16) vs 75000 IOPs on domain 0 for the same kernel version for 512B IO size. Is this expected behavior? Xen document says that the performance should be close-to-native.

Also, it will be helpful if you could point us to any performance results of Xen 3.0.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance..., M S, Rajanish <= Re: [Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance..., Rami Rosen RE: [Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance..., Petersson, Mats

Previous by Date:	[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH][RESEND][Builder] Check if v_end wraps around to 0, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] Testing status of fully virtualized guests (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable, Ed Smith
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH][RESEND][Builder] Check if v_end wraps around to 0, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance..., Rami Rosen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

This site is hosted by Citrix