|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Why is 'emulate' as good as writable PT's?
We have been doing some scalability work, and we noticed that forcing
'emulate' in arch.x86/mm.c achieves the same performance on 1-way dom0.
For example:
xen-unstable, changeset 10200, i386 with PAE, 1-way
benchmark xen0 xen0+emulate
------------- ---- ----
reaim_fserver 4421 4426
reaim_compute 2555 2531
SDET 4759 4810
The reaim benchmarks probably don't have much fork(), where I'd expect
writable page tables to help, but SDET has a ton of fork+exec.
Could there be situations were we are inadvertently triggering a
writable page table, where we should just be doing a update_va_mapping()?
-Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|