RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support

["Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>]

>Do you have a more recent patch for this?   I'm having a hard time
sorting out
>the rejects, particularly the ones related to xenoprof-generic.patch.
(I'm
>working against change set 10031.)  Renato sent me something called
>xenoprof3.patch (could have been his name for this patch), but that
could
>have just been his name for it.
>
>Particularly confusing are the changes related to CPU_MODE_XEN in
>add_kernel_ctx_swtich().   There's no case statement there at all
anymore,
>just an "if (in_kernel)" statement.  And all I find in oprofile.h are
>#defines's for CPU_IS_KERNEL, CPU_TRACE_BEGIN...
>
>Any help would be appreciated.
>
>Which change set were your patches of 4/28 against?
>

Ray,
My last patch is against 9872, which is sent out 5/6. The strange thing
you met may be due to the failure of applying the patch to a newer
changeset. Renato is reviewing the patch. After that, I can port it the
latest.

Thanks,
Xiaowei

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel