|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lower bound ondomX-min-mem
The patch I sent implements the minimum in the balloon driver and we are
currently building sles10 with my patch.
K. Y
>>> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:14 am, in message
<EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D30484B6FC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> I agree with this. I'm also not sure about putting a lower bound
in
> the
>> balloon driver, but at least there we know that shrinking to <2% of
>> original allocation is a very bad idea with very high probability.
>
> Keir,
>
> In lieu of the recent emails about ballooning, do you still want me
to
> look into making the balloon driver back off when it goes down the
OOM
> path? Or is it better for that too to be taken care of by some of
the
> higher level management tools?
>
> Ky,
>
> Does your patch address the situation Keir described above?
>
> [ASIDE]
> We are also seeing some other issues with ballooning. Not sure if
they
> are related. The latest one is described here:
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=650
>
> Thanks,
> Aravindh Puthiyaparambil
> Xen Development Team
> Unisys, Tredyffrin PA
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|