| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] PATCH: fix transparent virtualization issue
On 17 May 2006, at 12:17, Tristan Gingold wrote:
this patch fixes a few transparent virtualization (ie running
xenolinux on
bare platform) issues for xen/ia64.
Why not call xen_init() in the two places you added NULL check for
xen_start_info? Especially in netfront -- you already call xen_init()
in blkfront, so it seems weird not to do so in netfront. I see no
reason not to call it in swiotlb.c too.
xen_init() is a pretty bad name by the way, seeing as it's called all
over the place so it's not really initialising xen state at every call
site. Given that it is used in most places for the caller to determine
if you are running on Xen or not, why not call it running_on_xen() and
have the initialisation on the first call just be a hidden side effect?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home