RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Integrating applications into Mini-OS

["Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This seems like a really good idea. I have been meaning to fix
VIRT_START. I see your patch shows
-#define VIRT_START              0xFFFFFFFF00000000UL
I remember changing this to 0xFFFFFFFF80000000UL. Are you diffing
against the latest changeset? Could you please check if this works on
x86_64 too?

Thanks,
Aravindh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jacob Gorm Hansen
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:21 AM
> To: Ian Campbell
> Cc: John D. Ramsdell; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Integrating applications into Mini-OS
> 
> On 5/15/06, Jacob Gorm Hansen <jacobg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 5/15/06, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 14:18 +0200, Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:
> > > > I have attached a small patch to mini-os which ... adds a dummy
main
> > >
> > > Should it be marked with __attribute__((weak))?
> >
> > Probably a good idea, makes link order less important. Revised patch
> > is attached.
> 
> One more change: When providing one's own linker script (e.g. for
> changing the memory layout, my boot loader cannot exist at 0xc0000000
> but likes to live at 0x0), use &_text for the VIRT_START constant
> instead of hardcoded value.
> 
> New version attached.
> 
> Jacob

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel