WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 23/35] Increase x86 interrupt vector range

from [Keir Fraser] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 23/35] Increase x86 interrupt vector range
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 08:52:24 +0100
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 14 May 2006 00:57:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200605131346_MC3-1-BFAF-FA0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200605131346_MC3-1-BFAF-FA0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

On 13 May 2006, at 18:44, Chuck Ebbert wrote:


AFAIC this could go in anytime.  It's simple, self-contained and makes
sense even without Xen.

One minor nit: the IRQ value isn't negated, it's complemented.  The
comments need to be fixed.
If we really want it disambiguated then we should call it something like 'bitwise-negated' or 'ones-complemented'. 'Complemented' alone is worse than 'negated' imo, since negation is at least the usual name for the tilde operator in C while complementation is an ambiguous term unless you know the base/radix. 

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 24/35] Add support for Xen event channels., Keir Fraser
Next by Date:  [Xen-devel] Testing status of fully virtualized guests (Intel VT) on 64bit XEN unstable, Ed Smith
Previous by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 23/35] Increase x86 interrupt vector range, Chuck Ebbert
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 23/35] Increase x86 interrupt vector range, Ingo Oeser
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy