Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] initialize some more cpuinfo fields

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] initialize some more cpuinfo fields
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 08 May 2006 17:19:41 +0200
Cc:	xen-devel Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 08 May 2006 08:19:06 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<8024b2426110aa3e170a7a0b0291ace1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<445F5F50.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <bcc309c7d46b56fc31e28c806eacd0c1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <445F6F4B.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <1b14d0ca84ee2dc05f54c51efed760b2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <445F775C.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <8024b2426110aa3e170a7a0b0291ace1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>I think I'd rather keep the code where it is for now, and simply add 
>identify_cpu() to cpu_bringup() later when we support that for domain0. 
>That will simply act as a dynamic reconfiguration of the mappings and 
>relationships that get simply statically initialised in 
>smp_prepare_cpus().

I think I'm fine with that.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] initialize some more cpuinfo fields