WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] linux-2.6-hg tree: hypercall.h:252: error: previous implicit

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6-hg tree: hypercall.h:252: error: previous implicit declaration of ‘memcpy’ was here
From: Hans-Christian Armingeon <mog.johnny@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:24:11 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 May 2006 05:10:29 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
Hi,

the current hg tree doesn't compile for me.

any ideas? I'm on amd64.

Thanks in advance,

Johnny

  CC      arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/asm-i386/mach-xen/asm/hypervisor.h:111,
                 from include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypervisor.h:2,
                 from include/asm/mach-xen/asm/system.h:8,
                 from include/linux/spinlock.h:57,
                 from include/linux/capability.h:45,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:7,
                 from arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:7:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h: In function ‘HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op’:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h:252: warning: implicit declaration of 
function ‘memcpy’
  GEN     include/asm-x86_64/asm-offsets.h
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
  CC      init/main.o
  HOSTCC  usr/gen_init_cpio
In file included from include/asm-i386/mach-xen/asm/hypervisor.h:111,
                 from include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypervisor.h:2,
                 from include/asm/mach-xen/asm/system.h:8,
                 from include/linux/spinlock.h:57,
                 from include/linux/capability.h:45,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:7,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from init/main.c:16:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h: In function ‘HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op’:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h:252: warning: implicit declaration of 
function ‘memcpy’

[...]

include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h: In function ‘HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op’:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h:252: warning: implicit declaration of 
function ‘memcpy’
  CC      arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms-xen.o
In file included from include/asm-i386/mach-xen/asm/hypervisor.h:111,
                 from include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypervisor.h:2,
                 from include/asm/mach-xen/asm/system.h:8,
                 from include/linux/spinlock.h:57,
                 from include/linux/capability.h:45,
                 from include/linux/sched.h:7,
                 from include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms-xen.c:2:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h: In function ‘HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op’:
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h:252: warning: implicit declaration of 
function ‘memcpy’
arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms-xen.c: At top level:
arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms-xen.c:115: error: conflicting types for ‘memcpy’
include/asm/mach-xen/asm/hypercall.h:252: error: previous implicit declaration 
of ‘memcpy’ was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms-xen.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel] Error 2
r

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>