WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: HVM network performance

To: Steve Dobbelstein <steved@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: HVM network performance
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: 05 May 2006 12:23:56 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 05 May 2006 03:24:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <OF58615EA2.425AD1BE-ON05257164.006F0267-05257164.0071C512@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <OF58615EA2.425AD1BE-ON05257164.006F0267-05257164.0071C512@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Steve Dobbelstein <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> I don't see any obvious problems in the Xenoprof output.  Anyone with
> experience with the inner workings of HVM domains care to comment on what
> might be causing the network performance to suffer so much?

You'll never get good throughput either from a NE2000 nor from a pcnet32
model.

-Andi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel