|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Regarding page table management changes from Xen	v1to	Xe
 
> > On 64b we could use the 1:1 mapping of all physmem that Xen has. 
> > Obviously that is infeasible on 32b. In fact the interface 
> (passing a 
> > virtual address) pretty much means we have to use a linear 
> mapping in 
> > both cases.
> 
> Couldn't we temporarily map the page table page?  Not that we 
> would actually want to do that.  Just trying to confirm my understand.
Sure, but that's expensive on 32b as map_domain_mem has to do real work
(it's cheap on 64b as we have a 1-to-1 map of machine memory).
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] Regarding page table management changes from Xen	v1to	Xen v2 (and v3),
Ian Pratt <=
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |