| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: Hypercall number assignment convension (was Re: [Xen-devel] Re:[PATC
|
To: |
"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: Hypercall number assignment convension (was Re: [Xen-devel] Re:[PATCH]: kexec: framework and i386) |
|
From: |
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:07:37 +0800 |
|
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:08:16 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcZpB3F3PbRzHlhYTWaEo8XidkipmQAAPSWw |
|
Thread-topic: |
Hypercall number assignment convension (was Re: [Xen-devel] Re:[PATCH]: kexec: framework and i386) |
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年4月26日 15:56
>
>On 26 Apr 2006, at 08:54, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
>> Then we may need to fill that breathing space with do_ni_hypercall
>> to ensure no leakage from NR_hypercall check. If that's the case,
>> how about define the __HYPERVISOR_arch_* at end of 256 spaces,
>> and fill all unused entries with do_ni_hypercall. By that way, the
>> check
>> to illegal hypercall (<256) is a bit slower, however it shouldn't
>> matter
>> for that rare cases.
>
>Yes, it would need filling with ni_hypercall: we already do that on x86
>anyway (since hypercall table is rounded up to a power of two).
>
>I don't want to put the hypercalls that far up: with one hypercall page
>x86 will currently have a problem implementing more than 128
>hypercalls. I also don't want to put them right at the end of the
>hypercall space because that would make it harder/uglier to add extra
>arch hypercalls later on.
>
>I think 48-55 would be reasonable.
>
> -- Keir
OK, that makes sense.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home