| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: Hypercall number assignment convension (was Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PAT
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:32:09AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> The list of __HYPERVISOR_* defines in public/xen.h in the main xen
> repository is the canonical place. For hypercalls in our tree, simply
> grabbing the next number in sequence usually makes sense. I'm not sure
> whether having structure to the hypercall numbers makes sense (e.g., a
> range for arch-specific usage) -- if so then maybe allocating from 64
> upwards would make sense.
Won't having discontigous regions of hcalls break the NR_hypercall
masking check?
Cheers,
Muli
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home