|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
That should do the trick. 
K. Y 
 
>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 04/14/06 2:50 am >>> 
On 13 Apr 2006, at 21:29, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> Given that the function __sync_single() can be called in an
interrupt
> context, why do we call a   potentially blocking function
> (__copy_to_user) from within this function?
Good point. Would __copy_to_user_inatomic() be safe? It avoids 
might_sleep(). We know that the page fault itself (if any) will not 
block on I/O --  we only use __copy_to_user() to safely catch the fault
and return.
  --  Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen- devel mailing list
Xen- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen- devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |