| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] If the 'cdrom=' option is specified
Ewan Mellor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:29:13PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Xen patchbot -3.0-testing wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User kaf24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# Node ID fd526926e0d1c0671295aa7f4b952186c9345173
# Parent 408f51a850f47af4db20f43f281935909d502511
If the 'cdrom=' option is specified in the definition file but media is
not found in the CD drive then main() in vl.c exits and the guest appears
to hang. This patch modifies vl.c slightly to check for the presents of
media. If the cdrom cannot be opened then the cd entry is removed from
hd_filename[] and bs_table[] allowing the guest to continue initializing.
If the guest requires the CD media then the guest should report, gracefully
or otherwise, that it's missing.
From: Ross Maxfield <rmaxfiel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Doesn't this need a Signed-off-by: Ross Maxfield <rmaxfiel@xxxxxxxxxx>?
People have been complaining that a patch should not retain the Signed-off-by
line if the patch has been modified, because they do not sign-off the modified
patch. If a patch needs minor changes before it can be committed, we can
either bounce it back to the author, which seems unnecessarily heavyweight, or
do what Keir's done here, and sign-off the patch himself. The From: line
retains the audit trail, credit, and copyright, and it's clear that Keir
himself thinks that this patch is acceptable.
Just so this doesn't get lost in the discussion, I meant to say that I
was referring to the original submission. The original patch submission
did not contain a Signed-off-by line.
Regardless of the interpretation of the DCO, Ross should resubmit the
patch with a Signed-off-by.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home