Re: [Xen-devel] mkpatches: against ref-linux or pristine? (Was: Error compiling with CONFIG_PROFILING (xenoprof))

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10 Apr 2006, at 14:02, Michael Paesold wrote:

> You are right, I also see no real value in having one xen patch + 
> several extra patches to apply. It rather makes the process of 
> patching more complicated. Although rpm helps me with the patching, I 
> still have to manually review changes in patches/ everytime I rebase 
> our own RPMs... resulting in this very thread. :-)
> Does anyone see a use-case for not creating an all-in-one patch? On a 
> second thought, a separate "make mkpatch" (or a more explicit target 
> name) could provide an all-in-one patch without introducing 
> transitioning problems for users of mkpatches.
> Should I create a patch to implement that? (Seems rather trivial and 
> suitable for my limited Makefile fu.)
Actually I just fixed it already. :-)  I think there will be no 
complaints and, if that's the case, we can also backport to 3.0.2 
series.
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel