WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Enhanced debugging for assembler files


On Mar 31, 2006, at 4:21 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:


On 31 Mar 2006, at 03:56, Jimi Xenidis wrote:

This patch enhances how gdb handles assembler and has no performance issues and no size issues after striping.
Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Does gcc not pass '-g' through to the assembler backend? When I added -Wa,-gdwarf-2 I saw no change in file sizes.

In the gcc-2.x and 3.[01] days we had to manually add this for the ppc and mips compilers, so I did it out of habbit.
Seems it is not longer necessary with the newer gcc's

[snipped]
(cd arch/x86 ;gcc -... -g -D__XEN__ -D__ASSEMBLY__ -v -c trampoline.S -o trampoline.o)
gcc version 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-10)
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux-gnu/3.3.6/cc1 -E ... -o - |
as --gdwarf2 -V -Qy -o trampoline.o -


If not, then still would -Wa,-g not be better? It should use the best debug format for the target system, just as -g does for gcc. Otherwise I would think we should be using -gdwarf-2 for C files as well.

-JX

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>