|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching
|
To: |
Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching |
|
From: |
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:54:26 -0800 |
|
Cc: |
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, Jack Lo <jlo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Anne Holler <anne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Arai <arai@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:43:43 +0000 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<Pine.LNX.4.63.0603161444460.4458@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<200603131802.k2DI2nv8005665@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603162008300.11776@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603161444460.4458@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) |
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The code _you_ wrote can be put under any license(s) you want, so in
the worst case you do not need to rewrite your .c files.
The license might affect which other OSes could link in
the ROM though...
That's actually a hideously good point. I think that means, in fact,
that the ROM code specifically cannot be GPL'd - otherwise BSD might be
unable to use it. The LGPL might be more appropriate.
Zach
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Jan Engelhardt
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Andi Kleen
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Anthony Liguori
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Eli Collins
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Stefan Berger
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Anthony Liguori
|
|
|
Home