WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume tes

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test
From: woody marvel <marvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:49:06 -0800
Cc: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:41:42 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1142435669.5339.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: LTC
References: <1142360879.5335.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060315095841.GB20619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1142435669.5339.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: marvel@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry Ewan if there was any mis-communications, the patch is fine. I was
probing for greater understanding. Thanks.

wm
==============
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 07:14 -0800, Daniel Stekloff wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:58 +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > 
> > > This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume
> > > cycles of the TPM front- and backend.
> > > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the
> > > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies
> > > previous tests and the APIs used there.
> > 
> > Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to
> > detect sysfs capabilities.  I presume your patch depends upon Dan's, and 
> > I've
> > been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone's
> > happy with.
> 
> 
> Hi Ewan,
> 
> Please put the sysfs patch in as is, Woody is fine with it. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel