WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domUloader kernel command line arguments?

To: Matt Ayres <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domUloader kernel command line arguments?
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:25:54 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Byrne <john.l.byrne@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:25:35 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <44118B25.9060806@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>, Matt Ayres <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Byrne <john.l.byrne@xxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SUSE/Novell
References: <4410E4A5.708@xxxxxx> <20060310125733.GD5766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44118B25.9060806@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi Matt,

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:20:21AM -0500, Matt Ayres wrote:
> Kurt Garloff wrote:
> 
> >
> >You need to apply this on top of the other domUloader patches.
> >Let me know if this addresses your problem.
> 
> On a side note, WILL domUloader ever be integrated into Xen? 

Don't know. I definitely would like to see it integrated.
I haven't been able to follow the list too well the last weeks, so
I'm not aware of the latest discussion status on this.

> I much 
> prefer it over pygrub as it will read from a filesystem (vs partitions) 
> and relies on the host FS support (so JFS/XFS are no problem).

It should not come as a surprise that I like it as well :-)

> I know there were some complaints to the implementation, 

I'm aware of two complaints
(1) security concerns (you _mount_ the FS in dom0)
(2) the use of kpartx from multipath-tools which seems to be missing
    from some ancient distros

Anything else you are aware of?

(1) is a feature and it's the reason why we probably will have pygrub
    coexist with domUloader :-(
(2) we could help, by using fdisk -l and losetup rather than kpartx
    if the latter is missing; though fdisk -l would limit the supported
    partition tables to DOS ones.

> but is work 
> being done to make sure that domUloader does not die as a project?

Well, domUloader is shipped and used by Novell.
I guess I should set up a project page somewhere in case we can't
get it included in Xen.

Regards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff, Head Architect Linux, Novell Inc.

Attachment: pgp7dB51xmNHT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel