Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting

To:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:18:41 -0500 (EST)
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dan Hecht <dhecht@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:19:11 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<9c33166283d6dd2f00e26eb8c15c977c@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<43FCCB2C.5000408@xxxxxxxxxx> <43FCFA9F.8080407@xxxxxxxxxx> <9c33166283d6dd2f00e26eb8c15c977c@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Keir Fraser wrote:

> I don't understand the last paragraph here. It's not true that, for example,
>  available_time = real_time - stolen_time
> right?

I think that is true.  Not sure why it wouldn't be...

-- 
All Rights Reversed

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec, Gerd Hoffmann

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] cleanup p2m functions, Li, Xin B

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting, Dan Hecht

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] cpu steal accounting for kernel (i386), Rik van Riel

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting