Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question

[Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote on 02/15/2006 03:42:00 AM:

> >>> Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> 14.02.06 19:25:19
>>>
> >xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/14/2006 11:37:45
AM:
> >
> >> While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to 
> >> del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't
been
> >> deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending,
> >> 0)). Is this intentional? If so, how is this supposed
> >> to work?
> >
> >This has most likely been introduced during the recent merging
with newer 
> >kernel trees.
> 
> But this doesn't tell me if the current code is correct or has to
be
> regarded broken (as I suspect)...

It can be regarded as broken. Thanks for finding this
and I will post a patch later.


  Stefan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel