|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain
 
Keir Fraser wrote:
> You don't need to __vmpclear at the time the affinity is changed. You
> can still do it from within arch_vmx_do_resume() -- it is valid to
> call smp_call_function() there. That avoids having yet another HVM
> function, and avoids calling yet another arch_* function from common
> code. 
> 
Keir:
        The latest patch is doing smp_call_function() at time of
arch_vmx_do_resume :-)
        But I get another issue recently that need it to be done
earlier. In VMX domain save/restore case, it pauses the VMX domain and
then do states save (and destroy). In this case the arch_vmx_do_resume
is not invoked, so it looks like doing smp_call_function earlier has
other benefits, any suggestion?
thx,eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Jiang, Yunhong
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain,
Dong, Eddie <=
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Pin vcpu for VMX domain, Dong, Eddie
 
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |