|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process
Ian Pratt wrote:
What do you think? Should we stick with 2.6.15 or go to 2.6.16-rc1 ?
I agree that skipping 2.6.15 and going straight to the 2.6.16 latest rc
kernels would be a good thing, however I'm confused about one thing (or
more likely I'm just dense). Are you looking at pulling in one of the
alternate kernel hg trees on xenbits, or just manually updating the
sparse tree to 2.6.16-rc1. We have the 2.6.16 subarch merge tree, the
2.6.16 merge tree under ext, and the hvm tree under ext also. Is one of
these going to become the new basis for the sparse tree?
Another question this brings up: what is the process for syncing
relevant changes and fixes between sparse, 2.6 merge, 2.6 subarch, and
the hvm tree? Is there any plan to consolidate these?
Thanks,
Paul Larson
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, Wahlig, Elsie
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process, Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|