Re: [Xen-devel] do_* declarations (was: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PA

Hi,

I'll post the header file patch. Thank you for your comments.

Best regards,
 Kan

Keir Fraser wrote:
>
>On 26 Jan 2006, at 10:10, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>> on ia64, the do_* functions for hypercalls are called in C.  However, 
>> they are
>> not declared in any .h file.  I think it is cleaner to declare them in 
>> an
>> header file rather than locally.  The question is in which header file.
>> Thank you for any suggestion.
>
>include/xen/hypercall.h, include/asm-<arch>/hypercall.h
>
>If you plan to do this, include all hypercalls and only place 
>hypercalls that really are arch-indep (defined in common, or in every 
>arch with the same prototype) in include/xen/hypercall.h.
>
>  -- Keir
>
>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*do_ declarations (was: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] added multicall)*, Tristan Gingold* *Re: [Xen-devel] do_ declarations (was: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] added multicall)*, Keir Fraser* *Re: [Xen-devel] do_ declarations (was: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] added multicall)*, Masaki Kanno* <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Re: Re: [Xen-changelog] Export Xen driver util function symbols so that Xen drivers, Nick Logan

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] domUloader, Mark Williamson

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] do_* declarations (was: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] added multicall), Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] VMX status report changset 8666:5b004f4e76cf, Shi, Alex

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]